In a seismic geopolitical power shift, the United States is undergoing a fundamental realignment driven by tech investment giants, where billionaires and global corporate entities are now orchestrating imperial ambitions across the hemisphere.
Trump’s vision of an expanded U.S. “greater region” aligns perfectly with the hegemonic aspirations of the shareholders who run the hedge funds. Its territorial ambitions in Greenland, Canada, the Gulf of Mexico, the Panama Canal, the Amazon and, thus, Colombia with its strategic position in relation to Venezuela’s resources. This expansionist plan is a calculated move for the appropriation of critical resources dressed up in patriotic American rhetoric.
The agenda strategically deployed by the Biden-Harris administration and imposed in the West, is being systematically dismantled by the Trump elite.
“Trumpism” has been positioning itself on the continent as the ideological engine to seek dominance over this imagined “great region”. Its main objective is to ensure maritime supremacy and economic dominance in an increasingly multipolar world. Although its final form remains uncertain, its frontal opposition to both liberal progressivism and left-wing revolutionary movements is already crystal clear.
The tycoon’s victory in the U.S. and his push for America’s “renaissance” masks Big Tech’s voracious appetite for the strategic minerals found in our mountains and rivers. Those who now run Washington’s politics need these vast mineral resources for their ambitious space and artificial intelligence projects, key to their fierce fight against China.
This explains the renewed interest in the border region between Colombia and Venezuela, rich in resources of this type, where plans for “fragmentation” in the Syrian style, through a proxy war with alliances between the Colombian Military Forces and the dissidents of the ex-FARC turned narco-paramilitary structures, continue to be coordinated, no longer behind closed doors.
The Petro government, far from resisting these pressures, seems to be accommodating to them. The “total peace” narrative served to cover up what was essentially a counterinsurgency plan coordinated with U.S. intelligence services. The manipulation and falsification of narratives in media companies around this issue demonstrates how deeply entrenched these common interests have become.
Comandante Antonio García